top of page

Gloucester's Housing Challenges

This essay by Sunny Robinson was originally published in The Illegalist print journal, July 2024 in Gloucester, MA

 

2024 is upon us!


As Gloucester bids farewell to its wonderful year of celebrations honoring its 400+ years of existence, it has made little to no progress in addressing the substantial need for housing that is affordable to the average income earner in the city. This includes both of the following:

  1. housing that would be designated affordable within the parameters of the subsidized housing inventory (also referred to as deed restricted affordable housing, eligibility for which falls within HUD (Housing and Urban Development) guidelines) or

  2. housing - whether rental or home ownership, whose costs are able to be met within the incomes of the average Gloucester resident.

​

Gloucester is surely not alone in this challenging housing situation; a similar need involves most of Massachusetts, most of the United States, and indeed, increasingly large segments of especially urban areas all over the world. But Gloucester surely is in the thick of this situation, which affects large percentages of our population, both folks who are housed and those who are unhoused. Summaries of conversations in a multitude of settings over the last year have repeatedly noted unmet housing needs as a top priority – if not the top concern in the city.


It is definitely time to begin to address this concern in every creative way we can!

Cost Concerns in Gloucester

 

Most residents may be safely housed, but many are cost burdened, paying excessive amounts of their income for housing and thus facing potential deficits and debt in other areas, whether it is food, health care, education, transportation, child care, savings, entertainment, or some other common expense.

 

For those housed, the acceptable standard is usually defined as keeping housing costs at not more than 30% of the income of the household. These costs include rent, mortgage, taxes, and utilities. Using 2022 statistics, 48% of Gloucester renters were housing cost burdened - that is, having to spend more than 30% of their income to meet housing expenses; 26.2% are severely cost burdened having to spend more than 50% of their income on housing. Even with home ownership, 36% of Gloucester’s homeowners are cost burdened. 13% of home owners are severely cost burdened.*

 

These cost burdens affect all generations of residents in Gloucester

​

Youth - fresh out of high school or wanting to return to Gloucester for work and residence after college - face serious problems in finding available housing they can afford. With rents in 2022 pegged at an average of $1,900 for a one bedroom unit having increased in many places for 2023, to even $2,500 per month that young person would have to earn $76,000 or more to keep the cost at 30% of income; and that’s just considering rents.

 

A worker earning minimum wage of even $15 an hour would have to work 90 hours per week to afford that $1,900 rent to keep it at 30% of their income.

 

Even at $25 an hour, for a 40 hour per week job, this person would earn only $52,000 a year, $24,000 less than they would need to keep their housing costs at 30% of their income.

 

The HUD designated area median income (AMI) for a single person in 2022 was $98,150 in the geographic area in which Gloucester is placed; but the actual AMI for one person in Gloucester was only $64,141. Now in 2024 a single person could have an income of $89, 950 and still be eligible for 80% of AMI designated housing. But those aren’t typical Gloucester incomes; and the housing isn’t available!

 

For a family of three the AMI was $126,200; but for Gloucester, it was again well below that at $82,984.

And those are the median incomes - which means 50% of local folks earn less than those figures. Area median income designations rose for 2023 and will rise again for 2024; but actual incomes received are not keeping pace with rent, housing cost, and mortgage increases even as incomes do go up for some occupations and positions. The average worker or family is getting priced out of Gloucester. As noted, this conundrum is affecting most of the United States, not just Massachusetts or Gloucester, though there are parts of the country, like the Midwest, for example, where the housing cost problem is less severe than in Massachusetts.

​

Young families ready to move out of their first apartments into their first homes, whether a single family home or a multifamily complex, have a nearly impossible time finding affordable homes. The 2022 median sale price of a single family home was $663,000, an increase of 45% from 2017. But then there are also the mortgage, the insurance, and the taxes on top of the cost. Is the long touted American Dream of owning your own home, having to be set aside?

​

Many Seniors ready to downsize to a much smaller home or a rental unit from the home in which they raised their family can’t find affordable housing on their modest, fixed incomes.This also means those single family homes aren’t available to the middle generations looking to buy a first home. Seniors themselves often face three to five year waiting-list times to move into designated senior housing whether there are income restrictions or not.

 

Indeed, the insufficient supply of housing that is affordable affects every generation of Gloucester and all incomes from modest on down. No, you don’t have to hang on to all those statistics; but we do all need to understand a large percentage of our community is in trouble as to finding and sustaining housing they can afford.

 

Another way to see the impact of this problem is to look at where people live. The local economy employs 15,800 people, but only 48% live here. What part of that big differential is due to not being able to find or afford housing in Gloucester? Our local workforce, modestly paid, needs housing that is affordable and nearby to avoid the costs of commuting.

​

Addressing This Challenge​​

IMG_0978.JPG

What can we do about this housing shortage? There is no readily available or simple answer. Indeed the answer is likely multi-faceted. Surely we need to build more deed restricted affordable housing. This becomes obvious when we note that nearly 60% of Gloucester residents are eligible for deed restricted housing even if that is at 80% of the AMI. Even local teachers, social workers, fire and police employees are in some instances, eligible for some level of designated affordable housing – a fact that surprises many people.

But as recently updated, the percentage of deed restricted units in Gloucester has decreased from 7.8% to 7.5%. Gloucester is seeing far more high-end housing than affordable housing being built! How do we balance this growth? How do we make it possible for our younger generation who want to continue to live here, raise their families here be able to find acceptable housing and do so? How do we make it possible for young families and seniors to find the housing they need?

 

Levels of eligibility are generally defined as 80% AMI, 50% and 30%. Thus, depending on which is designated, one could be eligible for an 80% AMI unit at Halyard and be earning, for an individual, $78,520. But at Harbor Village where the standard is 30% of AMI the income eligibility would be 30% of the $98,150 – or $29,445. Again we remind ourselves that the actual median income for Gloucester is not $98,000 but more like $65,000.

​

We are blessed on the North Shore with having a number of not-for-profit organizations fully committed to creating these levels of affordable housing. But their construction and labor costs are not less than a for-profit developer! Where does the extra money come from? Yes, there is state and federal money available, but in limited amounts, that often means a builder, who has had their application approved for this support, first competes heavily with other builders for the limited amounts of money and then often waits in line for years for the money to actually come through.

IMG_0975.jpg

​On the other hand, there is a lot more money available for tax credits for high-end housing which, of course, developers successfully pursue. There needs to be serious review and revision of the amount of money available to facilitate affordable housing at both the state and federal level. Governor Healy offers us the Affordable Housing Bond Bill this year to help address this problem. We all need to study this proposed legislation, understand what it does and does not offer and then lobby our legislators to pass a bill that will genuinely help our community address its needs.

 

Communities can also develop local tax structures to support creating and sequestering funds to support affordable housing into entities such as Affordable Housing Trusts and Community Preservation monies, which many communities, including Gloucester do. Additional taxes, for example, on short term rentals can and do get designated for Housing Trusts; and rightly so, since short term rentals take units off the market that could otherwise be long term, permanent rentals. Restrictions can also be put on short term rentals, though this is indeed a complex problem since some people create short term rentals within their own homes as a way to supplement their incomes and be able to meet their own rising housing costs.

 

Should these taxes be even more substantial than they are? Should there be a difference in the tax structure for the unit in an owner occupied residence where the owner is trying to supplement their income to help pay their mortgage as opposed to a developer who is scooping up lots of houses for very high-end vacation rentals? And what, if anything, should happen to high end rentals that sit empty for long months of the year awaiting peak season rentals, while keeping those units off the long term rental market?

​

IMG_0974.jpg

Should the length of time for which such short term rentals are available be restricted to encourage long term rentals rather than short term? Should such short term rentals be prohibited? On the other hand, could a community incentivize long term rentals, rather than restricting short term ones? How?

​Similarly, how could a community like Gloucester incentivize the use of the Affordable Housing Trust money and Community Preservation Act money to facilitate affordable housing? Currently, in January 2024, our Affordable Housing Trust has ARPA money available to it and to their credit, is actively seeking proposals so that that money does get used to foster affordable housing. What other incentives could a community create to encourage affordable housing whether deed restricted or affordable within the framework of actual incomes?

 

Are there opportunities for helping seniors stay in their homes by converting those homes to two family homes, or creating an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) within the now larger than needed family home? Which should seniors live in - the ADU or the original home? What property management assistance might some seniors need to make such an endeavor feasible, if they don’t have family nearby to assist if needed? Where is there grant money to support such an activity?

Many communities like Gloucester have created so-called inclusionary zoning laws so that when a builder is creating a number of units, a specific number of those units must be affordable units. Some communities, like Gloucester - start this required inclusion at six units, others at eight, others at ten. Given the ever rising costs of construction, what financial assistance, tax breaks, or other incentives are available to these conscientious builders?

 

Does the City have unutilized properties that can be made available for housing that is affordable while still preserving much needed green space? Can we envision in-fill housing that fits within the context of the existing neighborhood? Can we thoughtfully evaluate all new housing proposals without first automatically rejecting them because, on first glance, they seem too big - or a story taller than the building next door, or the parking or landscaping needs more fine tuning?

 

Can we really leap ahead and require that all new buildings meet sustainable, environmental and energy standards?

 

Ought we be encouraging co-housing models, cooperative housing models, tiny houses as new ways of envisioning housing? Many communities are doing some if not all of these models. Can we? Can we also think of ways to incentivize them?

 

Cultural Challenges

 

What areas of the city are most desirable for additional building while still preserving green space? Can we, in a country attuned to the dream of single family homes, each with their own yard, envision more clustered housing units with shared outdoor space? Can we envision clusters of bungalow style units? Triplexes or quadraplexes? Side-by-side condos with shared green space around them? Such changes are not small and they do take thoughtful evaluation to see the benefits and achieve the best design. Change is never easy. But it can be both desirable, productive and fun.

 

Do communities need to consider rent stabilization programs to keep rents accessible to average, local income earners? How can builders be encouraged to limit their profits to reasonable amounts rather than pursuing the highest rents the market will support? How do we honor and support property owners who already maintain excellent housing and keep their rents constrained? In the concern about exorbitant rents, many of us forget that we are blessed, as quiet as it is kept, that Gloucester does have a number of small landlords who do maintain great properties and with decent rents that work for local wage earners.

 

Should communities consider transfer taxes so that when a property is sold there is a tax on the income above a set limit - $1M?...$2M…that goes to an entity like the Affordable Housing Trust to support the creation of more affordability? Do we all not have the responsibility to help secure the integrity and survival of the whole community regardless of income?

 

Now, that is a big cultural change for us all to embrace! Can we grow into it?

 

What are the other options that we can pursue to meet the full range of housing needs of our community?

  • More housing across a wide income range;

  • More deed restricted housing;

  • More state and federal monies to support middle and limited income housing;

  • Creative use of one time monies like the ARPA funds;· Incentivized programs to encourage additional housing;

  • Possible rent stabilization and tax transfer programs?

  • What else?

 

Can we rise to such challenges? Can we secure enough housing so that all our local businesses can draw the workers they need from the local community and at the same time, the very broad artist community achieve the live-work kind of space they have advocated for for years? Can we create the ways to build the housing we need so that the many generations of our current families can remain here, as generations have before now; and at the same time be a welcoming community that invites new generations to come join us in this lovely place at the edge of our roaring ocean and our calm, wide harbor?

 

Let’s find out! It’s definitely time for multiple, thoughtful, creative, detailed discussions about the many steps we can take.

 

Sunny Robinson, formally a public health nurse for Gloucester, now volunteers with Housing4AllGloucester, advocating for more housing that is affordable to local people and families.

 

* All figures are from the U.S. census and the census data as presented on H4AG’s fact sheet.

bottom of page